cameras & lenses
cases

computers & cpus
dj gear
fans & heatsinks
hi-fi
imaging
lifestyle products
monitors
motherboards

multimedia
networks
printers
power supplies
software
storage

 


active hardware
AusPCWorld
BestCaseScenario

DataFuse.net
DreddNews

GideonTech
PimpedOutCases
pimprig
unique hardware
unique hardware.ca
Virtual Hideout

e-mail us
hadbai ltd
pc-silent.de

 
 
20/07/2002- Editorial: RAID nightmare. by Saeed Amen

One of my previous editorial explained the principles of the RAID system. You can run a pair of hard disks, either using RAID 0 for maximum performance or using RAID other levels for data protection, like RAID 1 or RAID 5. I ignored the need for data protection and plumped on using RAID 0. My controller of choice was Promise FastTrack IDE RAID card. At eighty pounds it did not offer many features, but it did allow me to get on the RAID bandwagon. For the hard disks, I choose a pair of Western Digital 7200rpm 100 GB drives. Thus I had 200 GB of storage on my computer, quite a feat given that I had spent less than five hundred pounds! Several years ago you would have required many hard disks to create just 100 GB of hard disk space.

My computer was a perfectly decent dual Athlon MP machine. Each processor ran at 1.2 GHz. One of the drawbacks of a cheaper RAID card (apart from the fact most won't support RAID 5) is that it does not have an board processor to handle IDE traffic. With two processors this was hardly going to be a problem. Setting up the RAID array was easy enough. I first went into the RAID cards bios and created a RAID 0 array. Once that was done, I installed Windows (which required a floppy disk for the RAID card driver). Troublefree operation ensued for several months. Data transfer rates were phenominal. Using a hard disk benchmark program, made by Pinnacle Systems, my computer clocked 70MB/s, a simply amazing figure. Then all of a sudden the computer would not boot properly, as it kept on stalling whilst running ScanDisk. I knew something was wrong, but left it, in the belief that my RAID array would suddenly work! Then some Windows files became corrupted and I could not boot up. I had install Windows on a separate hard disk, and then access the RAID array through it. Luckily, it worked and I backed up my important data on the RAID array to another computer. Formatting the RAID array, and installing Windows on it, seem to solve the matter. That was until the RAID array failed again. So I went the whole tedious process of recovering the data and formatting it. Then it happened a third time. On this occasion the RAID array was totally destroyed, the RAID card wouldn't even recognise it! I eventually found the problem was in one of the two hard disks, which I promptly removed from the computer. I lost all the data on my RAID array, after I had done the last backup! Although only one hard disk was faulty, using RAID 0, means that this could be enough to lose the whole thing.

Now my faulty disk is being sent to Germany to be replaced under warranty by Western Digital. In the meantime I am running the other 100 GB drive on a bog-standard Ultra100 motherboard based interface. Once the other drive returns from maintenance it is unlikely I'll create another RAID array, and instead I'll just use it normally! True I'll won't get 70MB/s transfer anymore, but hopefully it'll be more reliable. Basically if you do plan to run a RAID array with IDE hard disks, which are a lot cheaper than the traditional SCSI hard disks (which tend to be better built because of the price premium), make sure you backup your data regularly, otherwise you might have a RAID nightmare. No, replace the last statement, whether you have a RAID system, or an ordinary IDE one, backup your data, with CD-Rs at 20p you do not have an excuse anymore!